« The Endurance | Main | Presence, Passion, and Power »

November 04, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cae2653ef0120a64acd7f970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Forgotten God:

Comments

Jeff Crawford

JD, GREAT word to Arkansas Baptists yesterday. Also, it was great to hear your heart on GCR up close and personal in the follow-up session.

Bless you brother, and the saints at Summit.

Matt Cummings

Good word JD. It is hard to compare any book to Crazy Love, that book was an amazing read.

One thing that stuck out to me in reading The Forgotten God, was early on when he told the story of his encounter with the JWs. He rebuked them for believing only what they had been taught to believe. He then challenges every reader to pick up the Bible, as though they had never read it before, and allow the scriptures to speak to us anew.

That was helpful to me because for so many years, I believed what I believed because First Baptist Jacksonville taught it. It was refreshing to be challenged to read the Bible and let the Spirit deal with us.

Thanks for all you do JD.

michael

JD, I love the focus on the presence of the Spirit. He is such a powerful force in the life of the Christian, if acknowledged and embraced. Great job.

At the risk of nit-picking, from what I can tell John 16:7 does not say the Holy Spirit should be seen as *more* valuable to us then if Christ were with us in person. The passage does not say the HS is "better" then Christ in person, it just says that it is "good." Christ seems to basically be saying "don't despair, there is a good side to this too." However, Christ doesn't say this good aspect is "better." Perhaps it is just necessary.

Besides, if the Holy Spirit were "better" then Christ in person, then God's presence with us on earth would be "better" then it will be in heaven (where we will likely once again be in the presence of Christ Himself, drinking wine with Him... Matthew 26:29).

Matt, great comment. Too many people let "the scholars" handle reading and interpreting the Scriptures. The Scriptures should be read (and interpreted) by anyone who is able to read. So many Protestants rebuke the catholic style of interpretation ("Scripture + Tradition"), but then they themselves are not willing to step outside of the traditional Protestant interpretations handed down to them by those they respect. At least the catholics are honest about it!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment